The
first legislation aimed specifically at curbing US surveillance abuses revealed
by Edward Snowden passed the House of Representatives on Thursday, with a
majority of both Republicans and Democrats.
But
last-minute efforts by intelligence community loyalists to weaken key language
in the USA Freedom Act led to a larger-than-expected rebellion by members of
Congress, with the measure passing by 303 votes to 121.
The
bill's authors concede it was watered down significantly in recent days, but
insist it will still outlaw the practice of bulk collection of US telephone
metadata by the NSA first revealed by Snowden.
Some
members of Congress were worried that the bill will fail to prevent the
National Security Agency from continuing to collect large amounts of data on
ordinary US citizens.
“Perfect
is rarely possible in politics, and this bill is no exception,” said Republican
Jim Sensenbrenner, who has led efforts on the House judiciary committee to rein
in the NSA.
“In
order to preserve core operations of the intelligence and law enforcement
agencies, the administration insisted on broadening certain authorities and
lessening certain restrictions. Some of the changes raise justifiable concerns.
I don’t blame people for losing trust in their government, because the government
violated their trust.”
Despite
the changes, Sensenbrenner and other influential reformers such as ranking
committee Democrat John Conyers backed passage of the final bill saying it was
an “opportunity to make a powerful statement: Congress does not support bulk
collection.”
But
the revised language lost the support of several influential members of the
judiciary committee who had previously voted for it, including Republicans
Darrell Issa, Ted Poe and Raul Labrador and Democrat Zoe Lofgren.
Issa
also chairs the House oversight committee. Adam Smith, the most senior Democrat
on the armed services committee, also voted against the bill.
“Regrettably,
we have learned that the intelligence community will run a truck through
ambiguity,” said Lofgren during an hour and 15 minutes of debate which preceded
the vote. No amendments were allowed.
After
the vote, Mark Jaycox, a legislative analyst at the Electronic Frontier
Foundation, said: “The bill is littered with loopholes. The problem right now,
especially after multiple revisions, is that it doesn't effectively end mass
surveillance.”
In
a statement, Zeke Johnson, the director of Amnesty International USA's security
and human rights program, said the House had “failed to deliver serious
surveillance reform”.
“People
inside and outside the US would remain at risk of dragnet surveillance. The
Senate should pass much stronger reforms ensuring greater transparency, robust
judicial review, equal rights for non-US persons, and a clear, unambiguous ban
on mass spying. President Obama need not wait. He can and should implement such
safeguards today.”